I have talked with some of the management on the ships and they claim that the alternative restaurants are not a profit center, but instead, usually operate at a slight loss. Perhaps that's untrue... I don't know. I do know that we decided to try the alternative restaurants (how can I give a realistic critique if I don't try it?) and in some cases it wasn't much better than the regular dining, and in others, it was much better. Without a doubt, the Normandie on Summit was the best food we've had at sea, and as good as some of the very best restaurants we've tried on land. However, we had the opportunity to try Freestyle Dining on NCL, and it is almost like having to pay for dinners onboard, because the no-charge dining wasn't nearly as good.
There are a lot of people who seem to like the Freestyle concept... we did not. We will OCCASIONALLY go to an alternative restaurant, but we prefer the traditional seating. We've also tried Personal Choice Anytime Dining on Princess, but there's no charge for the main dining rooms. We don't prefer Anytime Dining, although I can understand how some people may. If it eventually gets to the point where all of the mass market lines change to a Freestyle or Personal Choice dining system, we will not cruise on those lines, and probably will start vacationing in Maui every year like we did before we became cruise addicts.
paul