C
Cruizer
Guest
Cori Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Without some sort of copyright mark, I really
> don't see how a clerk could refuse reproduction of
> a photo... if the photographer doesn't care enough
> about his/her own work to bother putting a
> copyright mark of some sort on it, then why should
> I worry about reproducing it? in a similar
> argument, if I leave my car unlocked and my purse
> on the seat, if someone steals my purse, I bear at
> least part of the responsibility because I didn't
> take even the most basic means to secure it.
WHAT? Are you saying it is okay to steal something just because it is not locked up???
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Without some sort of copyright mark, I really
> don't see how a clerk could refuse reproduction of
> a photo... if the photographer doesn't care enough
> about his/her own work to bother putting a
> copyright mark of some sort on it, then why should
> I worry about reproducing it? in a similar
> argument, if I leave my car unlocked and my purse
> on the seat, if someone steals my purse, I bear at
> least part of the responsibility because I didn't
> take even the most basic means to secure it.
WHAT? Are you saying it is okay to steal something just because it is not locked up???